Re: Halo Wars, again

by Gauz on Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:56 pm

Well isn't this ironic..

Yah, I still don't have the game Mad

45 MAC shots in one area? I'm pretty sure that blowing harvest the fuck up isn't exactly good, even if they did lose. If they anticipated to win, who thought shooting the agricultural planet was a good idea.

by **Vigil** on Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:05 pm

Great, now my disc is playing up.

I hate my 360. It's starting to laser burn every new game I get.

I don't know how much longer it will last.

by RX on Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:08 pm

Vigil wrote:Great, now my disc is playing up.

I hate my 360. It's starting to laser burn every new game I get.

I don't know how much longer it will last.

With a few adjustments you can either fix your xbox or get a prototype spartan laser :twisted:

by **Vigil** on Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:11 pm

RX wrote:
Vigil wrote:Great, now my disc is playing up.

I hate my 360. It's starting to laser burn every new game I get.

I don't know how much longer it will last.

With a few adjustments you can either fix your xbox or get a prototype spartan laser :twisted:

I doubt it.

What adjustments are you suggesting?

by RX on Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:39 pm

Vigil wrote:
RX wrote:
Vigil wrote:Great, now my disc is playing up.

I hate my 360. It's starting to laser burn every new game I get.

I don't know how much longer it will last.

With a few adjustments you can either fix your xbox or get a prototype spartan laser :twisted:

I doubt it.

What adjustments are you suggesting?

If I knew I would already have had a laser... I seriously have no idea.. Ask Robborboy over at HWF. I think he is good at xbox stuff.

by **Kasrkin Seath** on Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:28 am

You can easily pull the laser out of its housing.

Find out what its voltage/amperage are and you can build your own circuit and hook it up to a couple AA's. Get a new housing unit with a lens, focus in at a specific distance and start lighting shit on fire.

by Gauz on Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:42 am

Hooray for inneficient home made laser weaponry!

by L0d3x on Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:34 am

x Gauz x wrote:Well isn't this ironic..

Yah, I still don't have the game
45 MAC shots in one area? I'm pretty sure that blowing harvest the fuck up isn't exactly good, even if they did lose. If they anticipated to win, who thought shooting the agricultural planet was a good idea.

If you think of the MAC blast power as a "precision bombardment" power instead that just uses normal ordanance delivery, which I kind of do for myself, then it all makes much more sense.

by **Vigil** on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:36 am

L0d3x wrote:
x Gauz x wrote:Well isn't this ironic..

Yah, I still don't have the game
45 MAC shots in one area? I'm pretty sure that blowing harvest the fuck up isn't exactly good, even if they did lose. If they anticipated to win, who thought shooting the agricultural planet was a good idea.

If you think of the MAC blast power as a "precision bombardment" power instead that just uses normal ordanance delivery, which I kind of do for myself, then it all makes much more sense.

Then why is it called a MAC?

It's misleading, overpowered and I doubt even the Super MAC cannons above Earth could fire 45 MAC rounds in such a short space of time.

It goes on the list.

by **Angatar** on Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:20 pm

The very big list. Atleast it's only fan-fiction.

by kslidz on Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:30 pm

this game is sex the only reason im not playin it now is cause im in school

any one wanna play later like in 8 hours or so (work after school) add me on live
my gt is kslidz like my name on every site

1v1 is awesome i also love 2v2
3v3 is a little gay unless you have coridinated attacks
i havent tried deathmatch yet

stayed up til 4 am playin

by L0d3x on Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:28 pm

Vigil wrote:
L0d3x wrote:
x Gauz x wrote:Well isn't this ironic..

Yah, I still don't have the game
45 MAC shots in one area? I'm pretty sure that blowing harvest the fuck up isn't exactly good, even if they did lose. If they anticipated to win, who thought shooting the agricultural planet was a good idea.

If you think of the MAC blast power as a "precision bombardment" power instead that just uses normal ordanance delivery, which I kind of do for myself, then it all makes much more sense.

Then why is it called a MAC?

It's misleading, overpowered and I doubt even the Super MAC cannons above Earth could fire 45 MAC rounds in such a short space of time.

It goes on the list.

Yea I know they call it a MAC, but I kind of renamed it myself to just plain bombardment. I think it's the thought of the power that counts...being a precision bombardment. If you just ignore the name "MAC blast" then it isn't such a big deal.

Of course it would've been nicer if they had just named it better, but we can either complain about it or get on with our lives and just kind of ignore the inconsistency. I chose to do the latter.

by thane321 on Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:05 pm

Vigil wrote:
Then why is it called a MAC?

microsoft against cannon. =]

by Ascendant Justice on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:02 pm

thane321 wrote:
Vigil wrote:
Then why is it called a MAC?

microsoft against canon. =]

Fix'd

by thane321 on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:14 pm

Ascendant Justice wrote:
thane321 wrote:
Vigil wrote:
Then why is it called a MAC?

microsoft against canon. =]

Fix'd

oopsie :oops: