Re: STALKER

by Cheese on Wed May 20, 2009 2:50 pm

I dont like Fallout 3. STALKER is one of my favourite games.

I see your point though.

by KristallNacht on Wed May 20, 2009 2:52 pm

well, did you play STALKER and THEN play Fallout 3? or the other way around?

by Cheese on Wed May 20, 2009 2:56 pm

Played STALKER at a mates, thought meh. Then bought Fallout 3. Then bought STALKER. I had never really thought to compare them though. Especially since I played them about a year apart. Still playing STALKER though.

Hang on, have you played STALKER? Just wondering.

by KristallNacht on Wed May 20, 2009 3:25 pm

I played a bit of it. Had problems on my comp though so i like didn't even get out of the intro area.

by Cheese on Wed May 20, 2009 3:40 pm

Ohhhhh... I can see why you'd say it the same then. Yeah it is a terrible terrible game in terms of crashing, glitching and bugs. Same with Fallout 3 though I guess Razz

If it likes your computer though (as it did on my third, and least good computer) it runs fine.

by KristallNacht on Thu May 21, 2009 12:11 am

i never said its the same, i've seen it running full and its quite similar.

by ReconToaster on Thu May 21, 2009 12:15 am

KristallNacht wrote:i never said its the same, i've seen it running full and its quite similar.

Aesthetically then?

by Cheese on Thu May 21, 2009 12:17 am

Either way. I disagree.

Imo, STALKER and Fallout 3 are as different as any other twin-genre games you'd care to list. But as always, the glorious imo makes this pointless. We should probably spend our time doing something productive like shooting zombies with plants.

After all, you don't want zombies on the lawn.

by KristallNacht on Thu May 21, 2009 4:42 am

lol that game looked fun