Star Trek

I've watched a few reviews and a brief plot summary.

The consensus is it's a good film, but a bad Star Trek film. It has more continuity holes than a piece of swiss cheese. And the time travel idea is okay, but some thngs don't make sense to me.

Why would Nero wait 25 years in the same spot for Spock. I know he's pissed because of what happened, but that's really insane.

How can a mining ship, even if it is 125 years from the future, be armed with hundreds of missles and be more than a match for a consitution class cruiser.

If you want a good star trek film, go watch the Wrath of Khan.

KristallNacht wrote:Vigil, there are no continuity holes.


and they didn't wait in the same spot, the had to find the place spock was going to come out of.

and if you noticed, the ship had mining explosives and mining lasers. not just like full combat missiles.

Really? The fact they basically threw all the previous stuff in the bin except for enterprise. Not to mention it's one big time paradox.

Or, they could of done the smart thing, and gone and warned Romulus of it's inpending destruction , by telling the exact stardate the sun would go supernova, and giving them the ship's databanks on the event, as it was there. Or if he really wanted rvenge on Spock that badly, why not just go to vulcan and kill him when he's just a baby, or klill his parents, so he was never born. He could of been a lot more proactive about it.

True, but I really doubt that mining technology from 125 years in the future would be enough to take on and destroy warships with such ease. It's like using a chainsaw on guys with swords and shields. You'd probably take out a few, but you;d only need a couple to stop him.

But I digress, I don't really mind that much, as I had lost interest in Trek anyway. I just don't like JJ Abrams.