Government group supressing 9/11 connections?

discuss

Not to use Maddox's idea too heavily, but; If the government can pull of 9/11 they can sure as hell keep it in the dark.

The bigger thing i've never been able to get my head round is why you voted Bush back in after he presided the biggest defence failure in american history

Cause there were no competent competitors.

I'm not surprised.

Hey, I used to live right near Fort Mead, I used to go to Burba Lake all the time, and my dad worked there

Food for the conspiracy theory.

Don't have the bandwidth to watch that, will get around to it later. IF it's Loose Change, I am just going to post a video response.

noir wrote:Not to use Maddox's idea too heavily, but; If the government can pull of 9/11

Which they can't. Not in a million years.

noir wrote:they can sure as hell keep it in the dark.

Now, riddle me this:
If the Gov't can blow up three towers in plain sight, buy off every aviation/demolition/mechanical/civil engineer in the civilized world, and pay off everyone who was involved, why the HELL can't they yank a video down off the internet thirty seconds after it's been posted? Why can't they keep tabs on anybody who starts asking around about 9-11? Why didn't those two nutjobs who filmed "Loose change" die of a car accident, or a drug overdose, before uploading the film onto the internet?

The answer: The Government isn't doing anything of the sort.

noir wrote:The bigger thing i've never been able to get my head round is why you voted Bush back in after he presided the biggest defence failure in american history

Maybe because 9-11 WASN'T a defense failure. NOTHING in the system was designed to prevent such an attack. A plane switches off the transponder over the east coast, you need to go through FIVE THOUSAND identical blips on the radar to track it down. What REALLY doesn't help is the fact that the air traffic control equipment dates back to WWII tech.

Bush stepped in, rallied the country, kicked in the Taliban's teeth, and did a smashing good job around the time of the 2004 election, thank you very much.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:IF it's Loose Change, I am just going to post a video response.

it's from RussiaToday.

It's about a very recent thing that's been leaked.

well if the government did kill the loose change people wouldn't it just arouse more suspicion to them? Like all conspiracies we'll probably never know.

an why are you trusting the Russian media on a US government leak?

tiny tim wrote:an why are you trusting the Russian media on a US government leak?

It has more credibility than a lose change video.

Rasq wrote:Why can't they keep tabs on anybody who starts asking around about 9-11? Why didn't those two nutjobs who filmed "Loose change" die of a car accident, or a drug overdose, before uploading the film onto the internet?

Maybe because they're relying on people like you to put forth such arguments?

tiny tim wrote:an why are you trusting the Russian media on a US government leak?

its in english lol

tbh I don't know why its called russia today. none of the content is in russian and only a tiny piece (almost smaller than america's media russia coverage) covers russia at all.

KristallNacht wrote:Cause there were no competent competitors.

A blind amoeba would of been better than Bush.

Sadly no blind amoebas have ever made it that far in politics. Except for Teddy the blind amoeba, but we all know what happened there.

it would have been.

but John kerry wasn't a blind ameoba

No, but he was a little more competant than Bush.

Not to mention the fact that Bush had supposeldy tampered with the votes the first time.

And he'd sent you into two costly wars.

And you still voted him back.