Re: The F-22

by **Rasq'uire'laskar** on Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:13 am

Ja/Da?

by **Rasq'uire'laskar** on Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:16 am

Kasrkin Seath wrote:yes, what we have for now, but switch the extra funding.

And I love how you use the term terror bombing. There is no such thing in total war.

Hey, I just use it because the Brits wanted to prosecute the Germans for the buzzbomb campaign. And then the Russians went ahead and sentenced Whermarcht and SS officers for actions against Partisans.

by **Kasrkin Seath** on Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:17 am

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:Ja/Da?

I was responding to pie, he asked who said terror bombing

by **Rasq'uire'laskar** on Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:21 am

Yeah. I went back and re-read that. Can't believe I missed two entire posts.

by Nocbl2 on Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:59 pm

Dude, I would say to keep it in production, but not use it. We really don't need it atm, since USA is fighting a ground war, dogfighters aren't needed. That's why the Warthog A-10 Bomber would be useful.

by Vtrooper on Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:01 pm

Nocbl2 wrote:Dude, I would say to keep it in production, but not use it. We really don't need it atm, since USA is fighting a ground war, dogfighters aren't needed. That's why the Warthog A-10 Bomber would be useful.

the A-10 is a tank buster not a bomber

by **Kasrkin Seath** on Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:10 pm

A-10's are close enough. Besides, I believe they can be equipped with bombs

by Vtrooper on Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:12 pm

Kasrkin Seath wrote:A-10's are close enough. Besides, I believe they can be equipped with bombs

yes but there not made for destruction of ground troops we use LGB's on the tallibam anyway and the A-10 cant carry them

by Barbbachello on Sat Aug 01, 2009 4:11 am

Arbiter Mereel wrote:
Kasrkin Seath wrote:A-10's are close enough. Besides, I believe they can be equipped with bombs

yes but there not made for destruction of ground troops we use LGB's on the tallibam anyway and the A-10 cant carry them

Are you sure, if not rockets and 1200 gattling cannon rounds should do the trick fucku

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:
Barbbachello wrote:On the subject of space bugs/weapons arent there plans to make orbtial drop troopers(bascially ODST's but not was cool)

Well, the idea is to create a plane that can get into low orbit and drop right into an enemy nation and disgorge two squads of Marines. By doing this, you can evade having to ask allies to fly through their airspace. When we had to do that with Pakistan, Bin Laden got away.

HOWEVER, once the Marines got to the target, there would be NO WAY to support them. They couldn't evac without running into the same problem that the airplane evaded in the first place. Finally, nations of the world could just raise the height of their airspace and we're back at square one.

So, it's not a very practical idea, the modern day equivalent of a jet fighter that can land on skis (Another real-life Pentagon project)

No i meant actual orbital troops on like a space station. I guess evac and would be a little odd. You could use drop pods for supplies i guess

by Ringleader on Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:42 pm

What would the money be shifted to?

Should the F-22 Money be Shifted