Homefront (PC, 360)

JumpingJet wrote:I know he is talking about single player.

The game seems so scripted, silly amount of enemies, silly guns, poor graphics.

1. As Death said, scripted doesn't equal bad.

2. Last time I checked, if you invade a nation, you don't fucking bring 50 guys. You bring a lot of people. It's not "silly" in the least.

3. "wait... real guns are silly?" This.

4. The graphics are not poor in the least. Don't know where you got that from.

I stoped by a local RedBox after work just now and gave this game a rental...

Let's see how much I can like it...

Divine Virus wrote:I stoped by a local RedBox after work just now and gave this game a rental...

Let's see how much I can like it...

We still don't have game rentals at Ohio RedBoxes

Well I finished the single player and it was ok. It was of course short and pretty predictable.

I played so far 2 games of MP and so far...it's ok. What I like is the whole big team V. big team aspect. The amount of weapons and sights and scopes etc etc. Vehicle combat. Drones and cars and aircraft. Bout the only thing missing is boats like in Bad Company 2, but it doesn't really need'em.

But yeah, I deffinatly like it, just not enough for a full $60 purchase. If people are still playing this after some time for a price drop, then I'll pick it up.

I'm glad I rented this to see how I like it. To get my shooter fix instead of this, today I'm going to pick up Crysis 2.

So yeah, overall, good game with good multiplayer to make it last for a while. Just not exactly what I wanted it to be.

My buddy said the campaign was terrible, and the multiplayer "Battle Points" system was atrocious as well.

Nocbl2 wrote:My buddy said the campaign was terrible, and the multiplayer "Battle Points" system was atrocious as well.

Maybe you shouldn't listen to your retarded buddy...

Nocbl2 wrote:My buddy said the campaign was terrible, and the multiplayer "Battle Points" system was atrocious as well.

Despite what your friend says, I'm not taking this into account as your opinion or anything you say about the game until you play it yourself.

Ruski wrote:

Nocbl2 wrote:My buddy said the campaign was terrible, and the multiplayer "Battle Points" system was atrocious as well.

Despite what your friend says, I'm not taking this into account as your opinion or anything you say about the game until you play it yourself.

Wait, when did he say that's his opinion? I'm confuzzled. =/

Anyways, buying a $60 game for just multiplayer is a waste for me.

I've seen lots of single player videos and it doesn't look as fun as lets say... Bad Company 2.