Which Holy War was Worse?

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Which Holy War was Worse?

18% 18% 
[ 3 ]
81% 81% 
[ 13 ]
 
Total Votes : 16

Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Zaki90 on Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:43 am

I have recently started a debate with some fellow students about if the current day "Jihad" against America is worse than the Crusader's "Jihad" for Jerusalem.

I'm have to say that the Crusaders were much much worse than our current day extremists.

Zaki90
Minion

Male Number of posts: 760
Age: 18
Registration date: 2009-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Gauz on Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:47 am

Considering we don't have a number of casualties in the crusades combined... I wouldn't know.

Gauz
Crimson Medic

Male Number of posts: 6774
Age: 17
Location: Artaeum
Registration date: 2009-02-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by KrAzY on Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:18 am

the crusades definitely...


war today is civil compared to the shit back then and the body count today is MUCH lower than any of the single crusades alone.




as for "motives"... both are differences in religious perspective culminating into violence... neither is more "noble" nor is either more correct or justified...

_________________



KrAzY
Painter of the Flames

Male Number of posts: 3103
Age: 22
Registration date: 2008-06-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Vigil on Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:16 am

The Crusades by far.

Their was no code of conduct or Geneva coventions of war.

The death toll was massive, combatants and civilans.

Vigil
Dark Knight of the Flames

Male Number of posts: 4092
Age: 22
Location: Unknown.
Registration date: 2009-01-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by kslidz on Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:52 am

well you guys have said that there was no geneva convention back then so what makes the crusades worse for not having the geneva convention i dont see the logic trail in that

im not saying at all the the terrorism is worse than the crusades but neither am i saying the crusades were worse than terrorism but back to my point

so if today there is the geneva convention and the terrorist disobey that then wouldnt that make terrorism worse than crusades in that aspect

but another thing is the goals
the goal of the crusades was to purge the holy land of heathens and to gain holy treasures
the goal of terrorism today is to kill as many people as possible that are believed to be christian
so between fighting for land while killing anyone who was in the way versus killing as many people as possible, I would say killing for the sake of killing is worse

second was the era
in this era there were many wars and many peoples were fighting
in fact the first crusade was focused at Jerusalem an actual city with soldiers defending and the fatimids were already in a war
while today the first big terrorist attack was solely against a civilian building and not against an army or a fort

I dont really feel like typing any more cause i have a 2 page paper due tomorrow i havent started on about macbeth
but if you are looking at more than just kill count these are some facts you should checkout

kslidz
Minion

Male Number of posts: 753
Age: 20
Location: your pants
Registration date: 2009-02-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Gold Spartan on Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:56 am

Crusades...and the Crusades are NOT jihads Zaki....

Gold Spartan
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts: 3402
Age: 16
Location: Kentucky, where else?
Registration date: 2008-03-24

View user profile http://www.fftu.info/forum/index.php?

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Kasrkin Seath on Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:25 am

there were muslim/christian wars before the crusades

Christian Spain got invaded before the Crusades began if I remember correctly

_________________
I AM THE LAW

[00:17:22] @ KrAzY : new law.
[00:17:28] @ KrAzY : the law can now be a person.
[00:17:28] @ XNate02 : The Law, can only be The Law.
[00:17:32] @ Gauz : I'd kick everyone....
[00:17:37] @ KrAzY : and that person is seath
[00:17:39] @ kasrkin seath : YES
------------------------------------------
[02:22:43] @ KrAzY : the reason we all come to TCF is because Seath is too Lord Pheonix damn sexy to stop.



R.I.P. EERC Tree
http://www.mtulode.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/eerctreeonline.jpg

Kasrkin Seath
The Law

Male Number of posts: 2770
Location: Michigan
Registration date: 2008-07-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Gold Spartan on Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:29 am

Kasrkin Seath wrote:there were muslim/christian wars before the crusades

Christian Spain got invaded before the Crusades began if I remember correctly

First crusade:The retaking of Ireland
The Reconquista was NOT a crusade. Just the Spanish taking back Spain.
Last crusade:Spain's invasion of England, or better known as the Spanish Armada.
The Crusades weren't JUST fought over the holy land

Gold Spartan
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts: 3402
Age: 16
Location: Kentucky, where else?
Registration date: 2008-03-24

View user profile http://www.fftu.info/forum/index.php?

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Zaki90 on Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:39 am

Gold Spartan5 wrote:Crusades...and the Crusades are NOT jihads Zaki....


Crusades are "holy wars".

Zaki90
Minion

Male Number of posts: 760
Age: 18
Registration date: 2009-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Gold Spartan on Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:43 am

Zaki90 wrote:
Gold Spartan5 wrote:Crusades...and the Crusades are NOT jihads Zaki....


Crusades are "holy wars".

So Europe invading Ireland under the cross is called a "holy war" now? Good to know.

Gold Spartan
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts: 3402
Age: 16
Location: Kentucky, where else?
Registration date: 2008-03-24

View user profile http://www.fftu.info/forum/index.php?

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Dud Doodoo on Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:26 am

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
Kasrkin Seath wrote:there were muslim/christian wars before the crusades

Christian Spain got invaded before the Crusades began if I remember correctly

First crusade:The retaking of Ireland
The Reconquista was NOT a crusade. Just the Spanish taking back Spain.
Last crusade:Spain's invasion of England, or better known as the Spanish Armada.
The Crusades weren't JUST fought over the holy land

Let's not forget the Teutonic Knights of Prussia and their war against Lithuania.

Dud Doodoo
Minion

Male Number of posts: 1398
Age: 17
Location: Your room
Registration date: 2008-06-29

View user profile http://www.moddb.com/mods/broken-arrow-the-world-in-conflict-vietnam-mod

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Gold Spartan on Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:45 am

Dud Doodoo wrote:
Gold Spartan5 wrote:
Kasrkin Seath wrote:there were muslim/christian wars before the crusades

Christian Spain got invaded before the Crusades began if I remember correctly

First crusade:The retaking of Ireland
The Reconquista was NOT a crusade. Just the Spanish taking back Spain.
Last crusade:Spain's invasion of England, or better known as the Spanish Armada.
The Crusades weren't JUST fought over the holy land

Let's not forget the Teutonic Knights of Prussia and their war against Lithuania.

I knew I forgot one. Only the Teutons failed miserably.

Gold Spartan
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts: 3402
Age: 16
Location: Kentucky, where else?
Registration date: 2008-03-24

View user profile http://www.fftu.info/forum/index.php?

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Zaki90 on Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:35 pm

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
Zaki90 wrote:
Gold Spartan5 wrote:Crusades...and the Crusades are NOT jihads Zaki....


Crusades are "holy wars".

So Europe invading Ireland under the cross is called a "holy war" now? Good to know.


Yes... it was still under the cross. Just like the Extremists under the crescent.

Zaki90
Minion

Male Number of posts: 760
Age: 18
Registration date: 2009-02-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Kasrkin Seath on Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:11 pm

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
Kasrkin Seath wrote:there were muslim/christian wars before the crusades

Christian Spain got invaded before the Crusades began if I remember correctly

First crusade:The retaking of Ireland
The Reconquista was NOT a crusade. Just the Spanish taking back Spain.
Last crusade:Spain's invasion of England, or better known as the Spanish Armada.
The Crusades weren't JUST fought over the holy land


THat wasn't even what I was tlaking about

_________________
I AM THE LAW

[00:17:22] @ KrAzY : new law.
[00:17:28] @ KrAzY : the law can now be a person.
[00:17:28] @ XNate02 : The Law, can only be The Law.
[00:17:32] @ Gauz : I'd kick everyone....
[00:17:37] @ KrAzY : and that person is seath
[00:17:39] @ kasrkin seath : YES
------------------------------------------
[02:22:43] @ KrAzY : the reason we all come to TCF is because Seath is too Lord Pheonix damn sexy to stop.



R.I.P. EERC Tree
http://www.mtulode.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/eerctreeonline.jpg

Kasrkin Seath
The Law

Male Number of posts: 2770
Location: Michigan
Registration date: 2008-07-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Which Holy War was Worse?

Post by Nocbl2 on Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:11 pm

The Crusades had a massive number of casualties.

Nocbl2
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts: 3954
Age: 13
Location: California
Registration date: 2009-03-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum