Carl Jung personality test

Your Type is
ENTJ
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
33 19 1 1

Your Type is
ESFP
Extraverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
33 25 38 22


ESFP type description by D.Keirsey
ESFP Identify Your Career with Jung Career Indicator™ ESFP Famous Personalities
ESFP type description by J. Butt and M.M. Heiss




Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:
moderately expressed extravert

moderately expressed sensing personality

moderately expressed feeling personality

slightly expressed perceiving personality

ENFP


This test was deathly accurate btw, only two minor points I disagreed with... it was fun

I might have answered it wrong, because I did not agree AT ALL with mine. I'll do it again and see what I get...

Second Time:
ESTP:

http://www.personalitypage.com/ESTP.html

Slightly expressed extravert
Slightly expressed thinking personality
Slightly expressed sensing personality
Moderately expressed perceiving personality

HOLY CRAP THIS THING PINNED ME DOWN EXACTLY!!!!!!! OMG!!!!!!

AAAAAAAALLLLLLL CAAAAAAAAAPSSSS IS FUUUUUUUCKING AWESOME!

Maybe you should've answered, I don't know, correctly the first time?

According to this I will make have great relationships with INTP or ISTP.

So Elabajaba and Death...

I guess we are supposed some "good times together" ;)

You are: ENTP
moderately expressed extravert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality

The career suggestion was very close to my acual path

I did this at school in a 30 degree celcius room with the entire year level in the room as well.

Heres mine doing it in a cool and comfortable environment
ESTJ

Where do you guys get the more detailed explanations?

I got ENFJ.
I don't like these tests, as a lot of the questions totally disregard the subjectivity in a lot of these matters and force you to take an impossibly objective stance. That's how I see it, and I don't really like it.

Anyway, ENFJ and after reading the further description, my aforementioned thoughts have been pretty much reaffirmed. It's all baloney. The ONLY thing that was close to the truth was the information about ENFJ Lovers, which was relatively close to the truth but not entirely.

Anyway, these things aren't that clever. They take an answer and make a very basic connection to something else, and nine times out of ten it's correct. For example, going on what it spewed out for me if you anything in a way that suggests you have strong emotions and a high level of emotional awareness and expression, it makes the basic correlation that, if you were a male, you would appreciate things that are seen as feminine, that most insensitive and non-emotional men would simply dismiss as non-manly. That's a pretty basic analysis there, and it was true for me, but so what?

I just don't see the significance of these tests. I mean, what's the point in answering questions only to have some machine take guesses at your personality? That's pretty damn stupid. I mean, none of the stuff in these analyses should be news to you, and if it is, you obviously haven't got any clue about your own personality or identity. You shouldn't need to be told this stuff by an online test. And the other thing is that people occasionally get these radical ideas, or they become possessed by a description used in one of these analyses, that they end up morphing themself into the descriptions given to them.

Anyway, unnecessary rant, but these things just shit me.

RX wrote:Where do you guys get the more detailed explanations?

Just google the acronym you got. Wikipedia has entries on each one as well.

Ziggy wrote:

I just don't see the significance of these tests. I mean, what's the point in answering questions only to have some machine take guesses at your personality? That's pretty damn stupid. I mean, none of the stuff in these analyses should be news to you, and if it is, you obviously haven't got any clue about your own personality or identity. You shouldn't need to be told this stuff by an online test. And the other thing is that people occasionally get these radical ideas, or they become possessed by a description used in one of these analyses, that they end up morphing themself into the descriptions given to them.

For the people who said "tl:dr".... he said "whats the point?" amirite?

Well while I agree with you that you already should know your personality, some people don't know the right way to.... describe parts of their personallity and apparently this test does. That and people want to.... "make sure" is the best word I could find, of their personallity. Aaaaaand others want to be "amazed" that a machine could accurrately describe them.

it says for me ISFJ

Gauz wrote:For the people who said "tl:dr".... he said "whats the point?" amirite?

Well while I agree with you that you already should know your personality, some people don't know the right way to.... describe parts of their personallity and apparently this test does. That and people want to.... "make sure" is the best word I could find, of their personallity. Aaaaaand others want to be "amazed" that a machine could accurrately describe them.

Yeah, pretty much.
Personally I don't see any point in taking these tests. I don't think anybody should feel any need to be told about their personality, but as I loosely said before, these tests slightly imply that people fall into certain personality types, and that each personality type should have certain characteristics and attributes. That's pretty much undermining the entire appeal of identity and personality, which is individuality, and how each individual forms their own personality and identity. I feel the same way about horoscopes, and star signs, and all of that baloney. It discourages individuality and almost encourages uniformity of personality by categorising personalities. They're too complex to be categorised in my opinion.

Also to Recon, for the sake of this unofficial survey, my type was ENFJ.