XBL vs PSN

yes we have a topic for this, but a poll will show what is more prefered...

A onesided poll so far.

LOL

PSN is completely free... and that's all it has going for it.

Hahaha. Go XBL.

i voted PSN. im sorry guys. My brother has a PS3 and when i see him play online, i really dont see a difference between the two, other then the fact that PSN is free.

X

Box

Live.

Even though you have to pay for it.

lol at the person who voted for PSN

PC > XBL + PSN

Rotaretilbo wrote:PC > XBL + PSN

/thread

Rotaretilbo wrote:PC > XBL + PSN

I still have to disagree.

PC is great for RTS and anything by Valve, but I've played a lot of other shooters on the PC, and I definitely prefer a console.

PiEdude wrote:

Rotaretilbo wrote:PC > XBL + PSN

I still have to disagree.

PC is great for RTS and anything by Valve, but I've played a lot of other shooters on the PC, and I definitely prefer a console.

PCs are better at everything except fighting and racing games. Unless you get a cheap usb controller, then it is ultimate.

they are Equal to me, besides there are no sqeekers on PSN

czar wrote:

PiEdude wrote:

Rotaretilbo wrote:PC > XBL + PSN

I still have to disagree.

PC is great for RTS and anything by Valve, but I've played a lot of other shooters on the PC, and I definitely prefer a console.

PCs are better at everything except fighting and racing games. Unless you get a cheap usb controller, then it is ultimate.

Again, I disagree.

PiEdude wrote:I still have to disagree.

PC is great for RTS and anything by Valve, but I've played a lot of other shooters on the PC, and I definitely prefer a console.

Pick up a game not ported from console, like any Battlefield game pre-Bad Company 2 that DICE has put out (Bad Company 2 is a good game too, but not up to par for PC shooters). When it comes right down to it, console FPS are all shit. The problem is that the console FPS market is so shitty that even shit can look like a Kobe beef steak to a console gamer. That's why, when you port these shitty games to PC, they are shit when compared to actual PC shooters.

There are a handful of exceptions, like Bio Shock, but that's mostly because Bio Shock is more focused on story and less on hardcore shooting whatnot. Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 are both Counter Strike clones with a few perks.

And can you believe there are people out there saying DICE is copying Treyarch by announcing Bad Company 2: Vietnam? Aside from the fact that DICE has been planning on making the game for three years now, Battlefield Vietnam, the precursor of Bad Company 2: Vietnam (Battlefield Vietnam is to Bad Company 2: Vietnam as Battlefield 1942 is to Battlefield 1943; BC2V is going to be Battlefield Vietnam on the Frostbite engine with fewer maps and fewer players per server).