Halo: Reach 2.0

Page 4 of 37 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20 ... 37  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Angatar on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:52 am

Prove me wrong.

_________________
avatar
Angatar
Lord's Personal Minion

Female Number of posts : 3862
Age : 22
Location : Long Island
Registration date : 2008-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:11 am

Prove the space combat does not work

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Angatar on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:26 am

I never said it didn't work.

_________________
avatar
Angatar
Lord's Personal Minion

Female Number of posts : 3862
Age : 22
Location : Long Island
Registration date : 2008-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Rotaretilbo on Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:09 am

Avenged wrote:Who cares would you rather the gameplay suck ass

You say that as if game play and story are mutually exclusive. Bungie didn't have to fuck up the story. In fact, it was probably harder to come up with the obscure shit that they are using to fuck up the story than it would have been to take a line from First Strike and do a thing about Spartan-IIs on Reach or take a line from Ghosts of Onyx and do a thing about Gamma Company Spartan-IIIs on Reach.

_________________
avatar
Rotaretilbo
Magnificent Bastard

Male Number of posts : 4540
Age : 27
Location : Arizona
Registration date : 2008-07-21

View user profile http://cdpgames.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:10 am

That does not ruin the story you all just have to take a step back and enjoy it for what it is because I know that after halo wars you fear the worst but this is not that bad don't let the little things ruin the good stuff

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by tiny tim on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:26 am

It's not really a little thing. They just contradicted the entire plot for a book.

tiny tim
Crimson Cripple

Male Number of posts : 1762
Registration date : 2009-03-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:40 am

Who cares the story in Halo Reach will most likly be better than tge story in whatever book your botching about. I mean I you are gonna read at least read a good book like The Catcher on the Rye or The Sun Also Rises hell let's throw in The Great Gatsby and The Clockwork Orange (and yes that was a book before it was a movie). Listen you all just sit here and say well that is a minor plot element that i don't really like let's shit all over the story and let's be honest that is retarded.

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Lord Pheonix on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:05 am

It is not a Minor plot element.


Minor is that MC was born in 2453 and they say 2454 (I don't know the fucking dates and I don't care)



This game says Hasley knew about Spartan 3's. If she knew about spartan 3's then she wouldn't have done the things she does in Halo Reach meaning it did not lead to Ghosts of Onyx and First strike. So that means this game single handedly gets rid of THE ENTIRETY of both the books Ghosts of Onyx AND First Strike.


That doesn't seem Minor to me.

_________________

avatar
Lord Pheonix
Lord Of The Flames

Male Number of posts : 7565
Registration date : 2008-03-23

View user profile http://www.thecrimsonflame.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Ascendant Justice on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:23 am

.....So basically Halo's storyline is all over the place right?
avatar
Ascendant Justice
Lord's Personal Minion

Male Number of posts : 2135
Age : 24
Registration date : 2008-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Lord Pheonix on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:29 am

Pretty much.


Someone who's read the books more recently than I would be better to explain it though.

_________________

avatar
Lord Pheonix
Lord Of The Flames

Male Number of posts : 7565
Registration date : 2008-03-23

View user profile http://www.thecrimsonflame.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by tiny tim on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:36 am

Avenged wrote:Who cares the story in Halo Reach will most likly be better than tge story in whatever book your botching about. I mean I you are gonna read at least read a good book like The Catcher on the Rye or The Sun Also Rises hell let's throw in The Great Gatsby and The Clockwork Orange (and yes that was a book before it was a movie). Listen you all just sit here and say well that is a minor plot element that i don't really like let's shit all over the story and let's be honest that is retarded.

So... Many... Spelling and Grammar errors...

tiny tim
Crimson Cripple

Male Number of posts : 1762
Registration date : 2009-03-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:43 am

tiny tim wrote:
Avenged wrote:Who cares the story in Halo Reach will most likly be better than tge story in whatever book your botching about. I mean I you are gonna read at least read a good book like The Catcher on the Rye or The Sun Also Rises hell let's throw in The Great Gatsby and The Clockwork Orange (and yes that was a book before it was a movie). Listen you all just sit here and say well that is a minor plot element that i don't really like let's shit all over the story and let's be honest that is retarded.

So... Many... Spelling and Grammar errors...
Yeah I'm doing this on an iPhone don't judge me

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:49 am

Also the books are bad I never bothered to read them so I guess that's why I don't care about all these small things then

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by PiEdude on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:50 am

Avenged wrote:Also the books are bad I never bothered to read them so I guess that's why I don't care about all these small things then

How do you know they're bad, if you've never bothered to read them?
avatar
PiEdude
Crimson Jester

Male Number of posts : 4571
Age : 24
Location : In the middle of a hollowed crust.
Registration date : 2008-03-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Gauz on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:55 am

Avenged wrote:Also the books are bad I never bothered to read them so I guess that's why I don't care about all these small things then
Die in a fire, the books are the best medium through which Halo story was told.
avatar
Gauz
Crimson Medic

Male Number of posts : 7687
Registration date : 2009-02-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:58 am

Really mean fall of reach was ok but the flood was terrible and first strike was bad and after that one I gave up on them

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Lord Pheonix on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:01 pm

Well you can't debate about the importance of the story if you do not fully know it.



That's like a Christian talking about Religion!!!

Very Happy

_________________

avatar
Lord Pheonix
Lord Of The Flames

Male Number of posts : 7565
Registration date : 2008-03-23

View user profile http://www.thecrimsonflame.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:05 pm

What I believe is that if you stress to much about the story you ruin half the game entirely

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Lord Pheonix on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:10 pm

Yeah, HALF THE GAME


I don't know about you but 50% a game is a damn lot of the game for them to fuck up isn't it?





Imagine that you played Halo 2 and stopped the Ring from firing, then Halo 3 comes and it instead says that Master Chief activated the rings so that he could destroy humanity because he felt he was above the normal humans.

You're saying that we should just go with it because "thinking about story just ruins the game"?

_________________

avatar
Lord Pheonix
Lord Of The Flames

Male Number of posts : 7565
Registration date : 2008-03-23

View user profile http://www.thecrimsonflame.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by PiEdude on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:14 pm

Avenged wrote:Really mean fall of reach was ok but the flood was terrible and first strike was bad and after that one I gave up on them

The Flood was written by a different author, and there's a general consensus that it was terrible.

What the fuck do you not like about First Strike?
avatar
PiEdude
Crimson Jester

Male Number of posts : 4571
Age : 24
Location : In the middle of a hollowed crust.
Registration date : 2008-03-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Avenged on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:16 pm

It was just boring no other reason

Avenged
Minion

Male Number of posts : 983
Age : 23
Registration date : 2009-07-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by PiEdude on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:20 pm

Avenged wrote:It was just boring no other reason

That's it?

It was boring?

It was the second act of a three part part saga by Nylund. Act II is always where the depth comes in, that's why it wasn't just non-stop action, or well spaced with action like FoR was. Not to mention it couldn't go on the massive time jumps like its predecessor, meaning it couldn't skip from mission to mission, space battle to space battle, and the like.
avatar
PiEdude
Crimson Jester

Male Number of posts : 4571
Age : 24
Location : In the middle of a hollowed crust.
Registration date : 2008-03-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by KrAzY on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:38 pm

Just curious Avenged

what books have you read and enjoyed?


don't lie, as I am going to quiz you on any one you claim to have read that I have read also, a test if you will


Last edited by KrAzY on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
KrAzY
Painter of the Flames

Male Number of posts : 3953
Age : 28
Registration date : 2008-06-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Lord Pheonix on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:52 pm

I wasn't really a fan of First Strike myself

_________________

avatar
Lord Pheonix
Lord Of The Flames

Male Number of posts : 7565
Registration date : 2008-03-23

View user profile http://www.thecrimsonflame.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by tiny tim on Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:55 pm

I haven't read First Strike.

tiny tim
Crimson Cripple

Male Number of posts : 1762
Registration date : 2009-03-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Halo: Reach 2.0

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 37 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20 ... 37  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum