Re: Halo Combat Evolved Anniversary

by Ringleader on Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:53 pm

CivBase wrote:I made the Blue vs Purple thread because people were attacking you for something small and it was an easy way to diffuse the situation. I figured the thread would die out right away and it would be over. However, you kept going on about it... which I didn't expect...

It, in your mind, was an easier way to diffuse the situation? What? How? Lol.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to call BS on that, for obvious reasons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4pvEeQDIUA

Everyone! Everyone! Ignore all the things RL said he liked!!!!

IGNORE THEM!!!

by tiny tim on Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:37 pm

Ringleader wrote:
Everyone! Everyone! Ignore all the things RL said he liked!!!!

IGNORE THEM!!!

Beat you to the punch there.

by Ringleader on Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:33 am

Yeah, tell me about it, lol.

RL just thinks everything is S***, even the things he says he likes.

by **CivBase** on Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:41 am

Ringleader wrote:
CivBase wrote:I made the Blue vs Purple thread because people were attacking you for something small and it was an easy way to diffuse the situation. I figured the thread would die out right away and it would be over. However, you kept going on about it... which I didn't expect...

It, in your mind, was an easier way to diffuse the situation? What? How? Lol.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to call BS on that, for obvious reasons.

....really? I even explained to Rock at the beginning of the thread that I figured the 'debate' would die out immediately and I could infract anyone who continues the conversation anywhere else. In fact, I DID infract someone (Seath, I think) for doing just that.

I explained this a second time in the sentence immediately following the whole "diffuse the situation thing" from the above quote.

by Ringleader on Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:27 pm

Well, you figured wrong, I really don't see how you could even come to such a conclusion at all really.

If you thought the debate would die out instantly, why make a thread at all? I was done with the whole blue vs purple thing by the time you made the thread, so this was either a huge miscalculation on your part or simply just a dick movie in making a thread for the sole purpose of creating conflict at my expense.

I mean, shoot, you can 'explain' that you thought the thread would die out immediately, (which I guess to you is a good reason to create the thread in the first place), a million times, that doesn't mean it makes sense at all though.

by **CivBase** on Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:11 pm

Well, you figured wrong, I really don't see how you could even come to such a conclusion at all really.

If you thought the debate would die out instantly, why make a thread at all? I was done with the whole blue vs purple thing by the time you made the thread, so this was either a huge miscalculation on your part or simply just a dick movie in making a thread for the sole purpose of creating conflict at my expense.

I mean, shoot, you can 'explain' that you thought the thread would die out immediately, (which I guess to you is a good reason to create the thread in the first place), a million times, that doesn't mean it makes sense at all though.

*sigh*

Because when you take an argument that doesn't really matter and isolate it, it usually dies out.

YOU may have been done, but other people weren't. So long as they were arguing with you, you would argue back (don't pretend you wouldn't). Inevitably, it would lead to... you know what? Screw this. I'm not going to spend the next five pages defending myself. If you have a problem with how I act as a mod, take it up with LP.

[Locked]

Anyone who continues the off-topic arguments from this thread in the new one will be infracted.